
Cheaper manufacturing is allowing designers to create a multitude of gadgets to fit our every need. On top of PCs, MP3 players, laptops and mobile phones, the netbook category is growing fast, and rumors of an Apple tablet have been circulating for months now. While having all these gadgets is great, data needs to be managed in a seamless fashion across this increasingly fragmented inventory of screens. Sure, Flickr and YouTube do the 'cloud' with crowd-sourced media, but where are our options for syncing more personal, secure, and private files? We just won't settle for USB drives or floppy discs anymore.

Perhaps a pioneer in this area, Apple has been offering data synchronization with MobileMe since 2002. The service pushes contacts, calendars, and mail to iPhone, Mac, and PC. Also included is iDisk, which with the new iPhone application allows storing, sharing, and accessing of files across devices.

Many other companies are attempting to create a solution for managing personal data. Microsoft brings these features with the new Windows 7 and mobile specific 'My Phone' service. Naturally, Google is in the cloud with Docs, Chrome bookmark syncing, and Sync for Mobile. Smaller, but successful, startups in the space include Dropbox and Drop.io (both have apps that make files iPhone accessible). And now there is Best Buy's new mIQ, which seeks to brand this mobile trend. All make the transition from performing functions on one device to another smoother, as the data is available in either location. One hurdle to mass adoption seems to be the platform bias of some services, for example, Microsoft's 'My Phone' plays well only with phones running Windows Mobile 6.

It seems that many are trying to become the one service to rule all data, but could it be that it is too big a task? Truth is, our individual digital rituals and behaviors vary too much for one software solution to address them all. Focused development will be key. This is happening in the cloud-based music space, for example. Being niche allows start-ups like Spotify, Lala, and Rhapsody to notice the most specific of our music listening habits and needs, then to design for them. With a fragmented market of gadgets, do we need a mass-market "vanilla" cloud for synchronized data, or a wide offering of apps for our variety of needs?
In any case, the proliferation of these cloud-based solutions points to an overarching need—the need to be seamless. Right now, it’s a frustration for users, but it will soon be an expectation.